
Holding companies
Many entities. One workspace. No guessing.
Brigham.ai models the group as it is: companies, brands and business units, with ownership and operating relationships. Every report names the company it came from.

The group, as a structure Brigham.ai understands.
Inside one workspace, Brigham.ai keeps entities. A company is a legal entity. A brand is a name you trade under. A business unit is a part of the operation. Each can own, or operate, another.
- Companies, brands and business units in one model
- Ownership and operating relationships kept separate
- Records carry the company they belong to
Reading the group.
Ask it
Things group leaders ask.
- ›“Which companies in the group had a down month, and which brands drove it?”
- ›“Show me every brand owned by this entity.”
- ›“Which business units share an operating team?”
- ›“Draft the group update. Name the company behind each number.”
- ›“What is open in each company that needs a decision from me?”
- ›“Compare deploy health across the group’s apps.”
- ›“Which entity holds this contract?”
One workspace is one security boundary.
The group lives inside it, so Brigham.ai never needs to read across tenants to see the whole. Nothing crosses a workspace boundary.
Questions about groups.
Is this the same as portfolios?
No. A holding company here is one workspace with many entities. Linking separate workspaces is the portfolio feature.
Can an entity’s data leak into another’s report?
Records carry their company, and reports cite it. Finance stays in its own protected domain.
Is the model used in practice?
Yes. It was built inside an operating company running more than 40 brands, which is how the group model took shape.
Give the group one chief of staff.
Get started and describe your structure.


